Even party apparatchiks failed to read Marx. In the former Yugoslavia, no one really believed in the ideology of communism. Renata Salecl: To an extent, yes I was able to write this book given my unique origins. Nikolas Kozloff: How did you pick this particular topic, and was your interest related to your own personal experiences and background in Slovenia under Communism? In theory it all sounded good, but according to Salecl, “The idea of choosing who we want to be and the imperative to ‘become yourself’ have begun to work against us, making us more anxious and more acquisitive rather than giving us more freedom.” Recently, Nikolas Kozloff, the founder of Revolutionary Handbook, sat down with Salecl to discuss her book and its relationship to the Occupy movement. In her latest book, The Tyranny of Choice, Salecl writes, “From the late seventeenth century on, the Enlightenment project promoted the idea of choice… And capitalism, of course, has encouraged not only the idea of consumer choice but also the ideology of the self-made man, which allowed the individual to start seeing his own life as a series of options and possible transformations.” This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.New York, NY – When people think about the word “tyranny”, autocrats such as Bashar al-Assad may come to mind. But to Renata Salecl, who teaches law at the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia and Yeshiva University in New York, “tyranny” can also refer to the anxiety-producing array of choices faced by many in post-industrial capitalism. References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEcĬitations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed Keywords: well-being maximizing choice cross-cultural. It is argued that, in societies where abundant individual choice is highly valued and considered the ultimate route to personal happiness, maximizers' dissatisfaction and regret over imperfect choices is a detrimental factor in well-being, whereas it is a much less crucial determinant of well-being in societies that place less emphasis on choice as the way to happiness. These patterns also emerged for the individual facets of the maximizing scale, although with a notable difference between the U.S. ![]() ![]() Although in China maximizing was associated with more experiences of regret, regret had no substantial relationship to well-being. However, in the non-western society (China), maximizing was unrelated to well-being. and Western Europe), maximizers reported less well-being than satisficers, and this difference was mediated by experienced regret. The results showed that, in societies where choice is abundant (i.e., U.S. Data from three distinct cultural groups (adults), drawn respectively from the U.S. The present research investigated the relationship between individual differences in maximizing versus satisficing (i.e., seeking to make the single best choice, rather than a choice that is merely good enough) and well-being, in interaction with the society in which an individual lives. The tyranny of choice: a cross-cultural investigation of maximizing-satisfising effects on well-being
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |